National Book Critics Circle Award Finalists Announced!

The short list is out for the National Book Critics Circle Award.  Click here to read the entire article in the LA Times.

The fiction finalists are:

Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, Americanah (Knopf) A LITERARY MASTERS SELECTION: OCTOBER 2013

Alice McDermott, Someone (Farrar, Straus & Giroux)

Javier Marías, The Infatuations, translated by Margaret Jull Costa (Knopf)

Ruth Ozeki, A Tale for the Time Being (Viking)

Donna Tartt, The Goldfinch (Little, Brown)

As you know, Americanah was Literary Masters’ October book; everyone loved it and we had fantastic discussions.  (For more on Literary Masters, click on link to the right of where you are now reading.)  I am currently reading The Goldfinch–not loving it as much as I thought I would (expectations, expectations) but it’s early days yet.  This is one long book.

I want to read the others…

The winner will be announced in March!

More Best Books!

OK, I realize that I am a week late with this NY Times link (click here) of Notable Books of 2013, but it was Thanksgivukkuh!  Anyway, lots of ideas for books to read and to give as gifts.  Literary Masters book groups and salons have already read and discussed two books from the list: Americanah and The Woman Upstairs.  One of these days I will get around to reviewing each of these wonderful novels–and I will fill you in on the riveting discussions that we had!

This month we are reading another novel that made the NY Times list: We Are Completely Beside Ourselves.  And our LM selection for May is The Lowland.  Hmm…do you think the NY Times consulted the Literary Masters list of titles for our 2013/14 season before posting their notable books list?  You can check it out also on my website; just click here.

I’ve read some of the others.  I must say, the James Salter novel disappointed me (I heard a collective gasp just now), but I really liked The Dinner and have recommended it to many people.  I loved The Circle and think it is a fabulous book for discussion as it raises many pertinent issues.  It’s NOT sci-fi if it’s happening to us right now for real!

I didn’t love Kate Atkinson’s Life After Life as much as everyone else apparently has, but it is a good enough read.  I didn’t think Schroder measured up to the hype.

Tenth of December: yes, do read it.  Ditto The Son, if for no other reason than to tell me what you think of it!

Here are the books on this list that I really want to read and that I hope find their way into my Christmas stocking (are you listening, Santa?):

The Goldfinch by Donna Tartt.  Her first novel The Secret History is one of my favorite books, and I am so looking forward to reading her latest, which is getting rave reviews all around.

The Good Lord Bird by James McBride, which just won the National Book Award.

The Sound of Things Falling by Juan Gabriel Vasquez

Dirty Love by Andre Dubus III

I have just started A Constellation of Vital Phenomena by Anthony Marra, but I fear I will have to return it to the library before I finish it!

Stay tuned for more end of the year “best books” lists to come!

The Samuel Johnson Prize: We Have a Winner!

I think you know by now that Literary Masters book groups and literary salons focus mainly on fiction, but each season we ‘dig deep’ into a non-fiction treasure.  My favorite so far, and I think my LM members would agree, is Nothing to Envy by Barbara Demick, which won the Samuel Johnson Prize, the UK’s premier award for non-fiction work, in 2010.

The 2013 winner of this prestigious award has just been announced, so let’s congratulate Lucy Hughes-Hallett, author of The Pike.  Her account of “a celebrated poet and Italian nationalist who was simultaneously repugnant and alluring” is evidently a form-breaking type of biography that escapes the restrictions of the genre.  Sounds intriguing.  The book won over an impressive shortlist of titles:

 

For more information on the Samuel Johnson Prize, including past winners, click here.

What good non-fiction have you read recently?

Literary Masters: The List!

Your long wait is over!  The 2013/2014 Season of Literary Masters is officially launched!  You will find the reading list below.  As you’ll recall, I allowed my LM members to vote this season; they chose our eight titles from a long list of books.  Everyone had fun with this, although making a decision wasn’t easy!  First, here’s the long list:
  
Fiction Category: (I asked members to vote for six out of the following titles; please note that the prizes and awards are for the author, not necessarily for the title listed below.)

  1. The Son by Philipp Meyer (Guggenheim Fellowship)
  2. The Lowland by Jhumpa Lahiri (Pulitzer Prize for Fiction, Hemingway Foundation/PEN Award, O. Henry Award)
  3. The Woman Upstairs by Claire Messud (PEN/Faulkner Award for Fiction nomination)
  4. Americanah by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie (MacArthur Foundation Fellowship, Orange Prize for Fiction)
  5. The Dinner by Herman Koch; translated by Sam Garrett (Publieksprijs Prize)
  6. The Burgess Boys by E;izabeth Strout (Pulitzer Prize for Fiction)
  7. The Round House by Louise Erdrich (National Book Award for Fiction, Guggenheim Fellowship, National Book Critics Circle Award for Fiction)
  8. How to Get Filthy Rich in Rising Asia by Mohsin Hamid (Man Booker Prize nomination)
  9. The Innocents by Francesca Segal (National Jewish Book Award for Fiction, Costa First Novel Award, Women’s Prize for Fiction nomination)
  10. The Orphan Master’s Son by Adam Johnson (Pulitzer Prize for Fiction)
  11. We Are All Completely Beside Ourselves by Karen Joy Fowler (California Book Award Silver Medal, PEN/Faulkner Award nomination)
  12. Telex from Cuba by Rachel Kushner (National Book Award finalist)

Oldie but Goodie Category: I asked members to vote for one of the following titles:
  1. Crossing to Safety by Wallace Stegner
  2. A Lesson Before Dying by Ernest J. Gaines
  3. A Dry White Season by Andre Brink
  4. Age of Innocence by Edith Wharton
  5. All the King’s Men by Robert Penn Warren

Non-fiction Category: I asked members to vote for one of the following titles:
  1. Under the Banner of Heaven by Jon Krakauer
  2. Lean In by Sheryl Sandberg
  3. God’s Hotel by Victoria Sweet
  4. The Season of the Witch by David Talbot
  5. The Worst Hard Time by Timothy Egan

How would YOU have voted?  Keep reading to find out how Literary Masters members voted!

 
 The 2013/2014 Season of Literary Masters Book Groups and Literary Salons Reading List is:

 
October: Americanah by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie
November: The Woman Upstairs by Claire Messud
December: We Are All Completely Beside Ourselves by Karen Joy Fowler
January: Crossing to Safety by Wallace Stegner
February: The Innocents by Francesca Segal
March: Telex From Cuba by Rachel Kushner
April: God’s Hotel by Victoria Sweet
May: The Lowland by Jhumpa Lahiri
 
So grab your reading glasses and join us for another fabulous season of digging deep into literary treasures!
 
To find out more about Literary Masters book groups and salons, or if you’d like to join us, please visit my website: www.literarymasters.net

  1. Publieksprijs Prize
    Publieksprijs Prize

Summer Reading Suggestions!

As Memorial Day Weekend is the unofficial kick-off to summer (and that was a whole week ago!), I thought I would post some summer reading suggestions–brought to you by none other than the most fabulous readers ever: my Literary Masters book group members!  Here’s wishing you all a wonderful summer–may you turn all the pages you wish to, both literally and figuratively!

In no particular order, enjoy these books this summer:

Life After Life by Kate Atkinson (there is another book by the same title written by a different author, which is supposed to be quite good, too)

Speedboat by Renata Adler

The Submission by Amy Waldman

A Hundred Flowers by Gail Tsukiyama

One Thousand White Women: The Journals of May Dodd by Jim Fergus

State of Wonder by Ann Patchett

11/22/63 by Stephen King

Enchantments: A novel of Rasputin’s daughter and the Romanovs by Kathryn Harrison

Eleanor of Aquitaine: A Life by Alison Weir

The Lady in the Tower: The Fall of Anne Boleyn by Alison Weir

Dreams of Joy by Lisa See

Sweet Tooth by Ian McEwan

Open City by Teju Cole

The Island at the Center of the World by Russell Shorto

Where’d You Go, Bernadette? by Maria Semple

Let me know if you read anything that is absolutely un-put-down-able!

Frank O’Connor International Short Story Award–the Shortlist!

I want to read a collection of short stories with my Literary Masters book groups this coming season.  We are absolutely spoiled for choice!  Do we read something from Lydia Davis, the most recent International Man Booker Award winner?  Or perhaps we catch up on one of Alice Munro’s collections?  She, too, is an International Man Booker Award winner.  Or perhaps we’ll read the collection from the winner of the Frank O’Connor International Short Story Award.  The shortlist has been announced:

  • Tea at the Midland and other stories – David Constantine 
  • Siege 13 – Tamas Dobozy
  • Black Vodka – Deborah Levy
  • Black Dahlia & White Rose
  • We’re Flying – Peter Stamm
  • Battleborn – Claire Vaye Watkins

Congratulations to these authors!  The winner will be announced in early July.  For more info, click here.

Should Your Book Club Read Schroder by Amity Gaige?

Hmm…well, this is a quick read, and it’s one that book clubs will enjoy.  I will not be choosing it for my Literary Masters book groups, however.    I would recommend taking this novel to the beach or on an airplane, though–it’s a compelling read.  The story is narrated by Schroder, aka Kennedy, who is writing some sort of apologia to his ex-wife (for one) because he kidnapped their daughter.

Here’s what I liked about it: it was, as I said, a quick read, one I didn’t have to exert too much brain power for, and I was in the mood for just that.  Yes, it’s definitely a page-turner.  I wanted to find out how reliable the narrator Schroder/Kennedy is.  I wondered if we had a Humbert Humbert on our hands.  The narrator in this instance admits to his duplicity up front.  Hmm…is he believable?  Is he forgivable

I liked that I really entered the head of Schroder/Kennedy.  I think the author does a good job there.  And I felt his love for his daughter, and hers for him.

Here’s what I would have liked more of: the bit about silences and pauses, and poetic reversals.  I think she could have fleshed this out much, much more and developed a much more literary novel.

I wish I knew more about Schroder’s childhood and relationship with his parents.  Although the author touches on the narrator’s background, she doesn’t give enough information to fully or convincingly explain the psychological reasons for what he is doing. 

I wish I knew more about Schroder/Kennedy’s relationship with his ex-wife.  Again, we get a bit of that, but much more would have illuminated the motives of the narrator/kidnapper and would have gotten this reader, at least, more invested in the story.  We don’t get her perspective at all–or minimally, anyway–so the story feels rather flat.

I think the author has the bones of a great novel here, but I don’t think she layered those bones with enough muscle, sinew, and flesh to make it a literary book.  I feel like when I try to “dig deep,” I hit the skeleton pretty quickly, and that is that–on to the next book.

I do love the name Amity Gaige, though. 

National Book Critics Circle Award–the Winners!

The National Book Critics Circle Award winners have been announced, and once again, Literary Masters book groups are ahead of the curve!  Our choice for this month is Billy Lynn’s Long Halftime Walk by Ben Fountain, which just won the award in the fiction category–yahoo!!!

For more on the awards, click here.

Should Your Book Club Read Imagining Argentina by Lawrence Thornton?

Ahhh…this is a tough one.  I think this is a really important book to read, but I have to say that it is somewhat difficult, perhaps too difficult for some book clubs.  When I say “difficult,” I am not referring to the structure or the plot or the story; I am thinking of  the scenes of torture that are essential to our understanding of what the book is about.

The story takes place in Argentina during the “dirty war”–from about 1976 through 1983–when a military junta, after ousting Isabella Peron, gripped the country in a state of prolonged terror.  Anyone who opposed the regime, anyone suspected of subversion, anyone related to those who opposed the regime–basically tens of thousands of people–were taken, or “disappeared,” in the middle of the night.  No explanation.  The kidnapped were tortured and killed.  Yet the regime denied anything of the sort was going on.

In this novel, Carlos runs a theater group for children, but when people start disappearing, he seems to have a magical ability to imagine what has happened to them.  Worried relatives seek his knowledge and he soon develops a following.  The narrator of the story cannot explain how Carlos does this and is skeptical, swinging from suspended disbelief to cynicism, much like the reader of the novel.  Yet, the narrator (and this reader at least) ends up firmly in the camp of those who believe in Carlos’ imagination–and its power to defeat the terror.

I would love it if your book club would read Imagining Argentina because I’d like to hear your thoughts on it.  It’s a very beautifully written novel (in spite of the scenes of torture) whose message I’m not sure I understood.  It seems like it was saying that we must imagine our way beyond the banal, beyond the evil.  And by doing so we will transcend it.  We can do this through art, through story-telling, through spirituality or other means, but it is very important that we do it.  That we remember and tell what happened.

Let me know if your book club reads it and what everyone thinks.  And if you’re not sure your book club should read it, why don’t you read it first–because every individual should–that’s for sure.

Should Your Book Club Read The End of the Affair by Graham Greene?

The answer to the question: yes, with reservation.  This novel was the February selection for Literary Masters book groups and literary salons.  It proved to be a very difficult book for a lot of members, BUT we had seriously intense and riveting discussions.  So, I say “with reservation” because, if your book club is more social than serious, your members may have trouble with the book.  On the other hand, if your book club likes to “dig deep” into great literature, this is the book for you!

So what can your book club discuss?  The following contains many spoilers, and is in no particular order.  In fact, forgive me if there’s a rambling nature to this blog post, but my head is swirling with thoughts due to the many fantastic insights my LM members expressed, and I want to get them down here.

Warp-speed plot summary: Maurice Bendrix is obsessed with Sarah Miles, who is inconveniently married to the unassuming Henry.  When Sarah breaks off the affair abruptly with no explanation, Bendrix is determined to find out why.

There are many lenses through which to view this novel.  Let’s take a look at a few:

The biographical lens:  Yes, this book appears to be somewhat autobiographical.  Greene’s house on Clapham Common was bombed during WWII.  Greene had an adulterous relationship with a woman who seems strikingly like the character Sarah.  Greene and his lover kept diaries that they shared.  Greene converted to Catholicism but seemed to struggle with his faith.  Greene went through Jungian psychoanalysis when he was young–and this book seems to be some sort of therapy for both Greene and Bendrix.  Greene is said to have suffered from depression (and was bipolar according to some accounts) throughout his life.

However, most of us knew none of the above before we read the book, so this information colored our reading experience in retrospect.  Once we knew these details, though, we couldn’t help but conflate the life of Green with the lives of his characters.  And let’s not forget that we have an author, Greene, writing about an author, Bendrix, writing about the end of his affair…who comes across the diary of his lover…

The historical lens:  We all discussed how this novel was about more than a love affair; it was about a whole new world that had exploded on the scene, literally, due to two world wars.  We talked about how of course one would question his or her faith–and whether there could be a God in a world that had seen such atrocities.  Note the references to the Victorian age in the novel, and see what message you can take away.

The psychoanalytic lens:  I mentioned above that Greene went through Jungian therapy, and my bet is that he read plenty of Freud.  So was it intentional on his part, or am I just reading into the novel the structure of the Oedipus Complex?  Motherless Bendrix has found his substitute in Sarah; he is the phallus for her, and the two of them are emotionally inseparable.  When Sarah, in the role of mother, leaves Bendrix, in the role of child, for the father–and in this case it’s God the Father–Bendrix attempts to kill that father by denying his existence.

And if you don’t like that triangle, how about this one: the Karpman Triangle, where each of three people take on a role of either Persecutor, Victim, or Rescuer.  In this relationship dynamic (which you can google to find out more about–it’s really interesting) the roles are very fluid with the three individuals moving around and taking on a different role at various times.  One Literary Master member brought this to our attention; she said she was seeing these triangles all over the story!

We have more than a few feminists among us, and there was quite a lot of discussion about Sarah and what she got out of her relationship with Bendrix.  We tried to understand her in the context of the times, but she is a slippery one–we couldn’t agree on her at all.  Lacan would have a field day with this!  (You know, Jacques Lacan, the “French Freud.”)  Sarah needs someone to admire her–to validate her existence.  You’ll want to talk about her mother and how that relationship has affected Sarah.  Interestingly, more than a few of us thought that Sarah made her vow as a way to break off her relationship with Bendrix.

No matter how you feel about Sarah, you’ll want to discuss whether she truly did believe in God.  And if yes, when and why.

You’ll want to explore the same question about Bendrix.

Henry is another character that will consume quite a bit of your time.  Some of us saw some homosexual tendencies in him–and in Bendrix.  Regardless, you’ll want to dig deep into Henry’s motivations.

This has been called a “Catholic novel” by critics.  You may or may not agree with this characterization, but you will want to discuss the miracles that occur in the story.  Are they truly miracles, or is there always a scientific explanation for what has occurred?  Are they just coincidences?

You’ll want to discuss the role of suffering in the story and how it relates to love.

You’ll want to discuss the language and Greene’s use of opposites for effect. Not only are words and phrases contrasted; characters are as well.  We have the “high” and the “low” and you’ll want to wonder why.  Speaking of characters, you’ll want to carve out quite some time to discuss the secondary characters in this novel.  For example, what is the purpose of the scene with Sylvia Black?  (My answer–just a hint–focus on her initials…)

You’ll want to discuss the symbolism and imagery in the story.  (Does Bendrix “rise from the dead”?)

If you’ve read all the way to here, kudos to you.  You’re obviously a serious reader who will enjoy Greene’s work.  When you’ve finished the novel, watch the movie (I watched the version with Julianne Moore and Ralph Fiennes).  You’ll want to compare it with the book.  It’s really good!

As always, let me know how your book club gets on–and enjoy!