Author: literarymasters

Should Your Book Club Read The Glass Room by Simon Mawer?

literarymasters Book Clubs, book groups, Literary Masters book groups, Man Booker, Simon Mawer 4 Comments

This is an easy one.  The answer is absolutely yes.  Not only did everyone love this book, it made for a lively discussion in all my Literary Masters book groups.

The Glass Room was short-listed for the Man Booker last year, but defeated by The Finkler Question.  Go figure.  I had never read anything by Simon Mawer, but now I’m looking forward to picking up The Fall, recommended by one of my Literary Masters members.

Quick plot summary:  It’s the late 1920’s in Czechoslovakia.  Victor and Leisl Landauer want to build a house that embodies the future and that has nothing to do with the past.  They hire an architect who doesn’t build walls and ceilings–instead he captures space and light.  Blazing the trail of what will come to be known as the modernist movement in architecture, he builds the Landauer couple a glass house, the main feature of which is the glass room, a sanctuary of calm, reason, and scientific rationality.

The thing is, a lot goes on inside this sanctuary, not all of it calm, reasonable or rational at all.

The book takes us through about 7 decades, and during that time we watch as various characters–with various agendas–enter and leave the glass room.  Do they transform it?  Does it transform them?  That was something we discussed at length in our meetings.

Simon Mawer is a wonderful writer, so it’s easy to speed through this book; I found it to be a compelling page-turner.  But there’s a lot there to think about and reflect upon, so it’s worth slowing down and savoring this novel.  The characters are intriguing, to say the least, and we talked about them in depth–their motivations, their desires, their self-delusions.  How they tried to escape their histories–as well as their present places in time–but to no avail.  And we talked about them as metaphors for what was going on at that time in the world.

Besides the characters, some of the things your book club may want to discuss:  What the glass room represents.  We started off each meeting with this question, and you’d be amazed at the various answers!  I always find it fascinating that we can read the same words and interpret them differently.  Don’t forget to discuss the onyx wall!

You can all think about what this book is saying about history.  The structure of the book, with its many parallels and echoes, adds much to this conversation.

This novel explores big ideas, and your book club may want to do the same.  Science versus God, Nature versus Nurture, Science versus Art, Fate/destiny versus Randomness/chaos, Darwinism, Existentialism–they are all in there in some way, and you can have fun ‘digging deep’ into this literary treasure.  (I am only touching on some of the themes in the book here–I’m telling you, it is chock full!)

The Glass Room is not a perfect book, but it has so many wonderful qualities, a reader can easily put up with the two annoying aspects of it (as mentioned by reader after reader)–the ending, and the continual coincidences that pepper the story and strain credibility.  I happened to find neither annoying, and I think the coincidences underscore one of the main themes of the book, that is fate/destiny versus randomness/chaos.

I feel very comfortable highly recommending this book for an individual reader as well as for book groups.  I cannot believe that The Finkler Question won the Man Booker over The Glass Room, but that’s a discussion and a blog post for another day!  Please let me know if your book club reads The Glass Room–and what you all think of it.

John The Revelator by Peter Murphy

literarymasters book groups, International IMPAC Dublin Literary Award, Irish Novels, John The Revelator, Peter Murphy Leave a comment

A few years back I read The Gathering by Anne Enright and it put me off Irish writers for a while.  Silly, I know, but I hated that book.  John The Revelator, however, just could bring me back into the fold–what a book.  Bottom line:  Read it!  But only if you like to think about what you read.  Should your book club read it?  I think so, yes.  There’s loads to discuss–again, only if your group likes to think and will make an effort to dig into the layers of this gem.

Yes, it is a gem.  With multiple facets.  One facet  is the coming-of-age narrative of John Devine, who lives with his mother in a small village in Ireland.  Their relationship is what anchors John and what, in my opinion, also anchors the book.  John’s mom cleans all the houses in the village and tries to keep her son clean and on the straight and narrow with the good guidance of the bible.  She is occasionally helped, whether she likes it or not, by their know-it-all neighbor, Mrs. Nagle.  The love John’s mom has for him is palpable, wafting through the cigarette fog that surrounds her.  (Like any decent Irish novel there’s lots of drinking and smoking.)

Another facet is the relationship John has with his new found friend, James Corboy, “a self-styled Rimbaudian boy wonder.”  James experiences life like John never has, and then writes stories about it.  The question is, are the stories true?  Story-telling, in fact, plays a big role in this book.  The Irish are known for their talent at this, right?, and John loves to hear the tales others tell him.  And what about the Catholic Church?  It tells some whoppers, doesn’t it?  A great book club discussion could be about the novel’s exploration of story-telling, writing, and where the truth lies.

Don’t be fooled into thinking that nothing happens in this book, that it is, as I read someone say about it, just a bunch of stories or anecdotes strung together.  It is far from that.  James Corboy’s writing, which are quite revelatory to both John and the reader, move the plot merrily along, but they also add much depth and meaning to the novel as a whole.  

Speaking of writing, that is another facet of this gem; it is superbly poetic at times.  John suffers from horrible dreams, and the descriptions are wonderfully weird, full of symbolism and metaphor.  Great stuff for your book club to dig into.  Hmm…James Corbey.  Initials JC.  Significant?  My suspicion is that if you were raised Catholic, you will love this book!  There’s lots of fodder for a discussion about religion here.  There is also a crow who plays a large role in John nightmares.  Hmm…there was a rather important crow in The Twin, which I reviewed here.  What’s up with the crows?

All these facets combine to dazzle the reader–this is one of those books that I didn’t want to put down, and I looked forward to curling up with it.  Don’t get me wrong, though–it’s not a ripping page-turner.  It’s surprisingly dense and it forces the reader to slowly savor it.  Honestly, it is like holding a gem in your hands–you should really examine it, turning it over to appreciate all its sides, all its splendor.


John The Revelator is on the long-list for the International IMPAC Dublin Award Literary Award, and I have high hopes for it.  According to the book jacket, this is Peter Murphy’s debut novel.  I can’t wait for more from him!

Amaryllis in Blueberry by Christina Meldrum in Book Stores February 8th!

literarymasters Uncategorized Leave a comment

This is an exciting announcement!  You loved Madapple, Christina Meldrum’s debut novel, and you’ve asked repeatedly for more from this incredibly talented author.  Well, the wait is over!  Her new novel, Amaryllis in Blueberry, will be in book stores February 8th–that’s next Tuesday!  Her publisher, Gallery Books, a division of Simon & Schuster, thinks this book will be particularly loved by book clubs.  And who better to decide that than us?  Please let me know what you think of it after you read it!

Here’s a link to a very cool video preview of the book:
http://youtu.be/tfaz9mJ0-IE

And here’s some reviews from critics:
http://www.christinameldrum.com/amaryllis.php#praise

Happy Reading!

Should Your Book Club Read Family Album by Penelope Lively?

literarymasters book groups, Family Album, Penelope Lively 1 Comment


As you know, Family Album was this month’s Literary Masters book groups’ novel. Wow, did it generate great discussions. If you’re just reading for the bottom line, here it is: this is a really good book, but not everyone likes it. Some dismiss it as too light (until they are in one of my literary salons!) and some think it’s just ho-hum. Most people, though, loved it. And it is a great choice for a book club.

Quick plot summary: Nine people living under the same roof, a large Edwardian house–called Allersmead–in the English countryside, are remembering their time there as a family. And family is what Allersmead is all about. Alison, the mother, raises a brood of six children with the help of her au pair Ingrid while the father Charles writes books in his library. Alison is, well, picture a frumpy Martha Stewart on steroids. If it’s something that will scream “this is what a happy family does,” then Alison does it. Anything to raise a happy family, right?

But as Tolstoy told us all, “All happy families are alike; each unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.” As we get to know, through the various characters, what it was like growing up in Allersmead, we begin to sense something rather dark lurking under all that happy family business. And we come to learn why the family really is quite unhappy–in its very own way.

Penelope Lively’s writing is ironic, subtle, and nuanced, and her portrait of the family seems simple but is deeply complex. Your book club could spend the entire meeting discussing the varied configurations of family members alone. You can discuss Allersmead as a character, some would say the most important character of the novel, and how it is a metaphor.

But there is so much more to discuss! The novel is a meditation on how memory works in many ways, and how it constructs our reality. You can talk about whether one can ever know, really know, a sibling or parent, or one’s self for that matter. You can talk about how family stories or myths are built, and how they differ among family members. You can ponder why we remember some things from our childhood but not others.

Well, I could go on, but instead why don’t you contact me for “Points to Ponder” for your book club to use. Now, I want to tell you to ask your book club the following question, but stop now if you haven’t yet read the book. Come back when you have finished it, and ask them: SPOILER ALERT–“Who do you think cut up Charles’ manuscript?”

Now, most people will think that Clare did it, because Ingrid tells Clare that she did it. However, a very astute reader in one of my groups has a different theory.

She thinks that Ingrid did it because she was angry with Charles. Remember now, this is the scene where Ingrid says to Charles “I am a servant.” When Ingrid later tells Clare that she did it, Clare has no recollection of having done so. Yet Ingrid plants the myth of Clare’s guilt by telling Clare she has done it, and this becomes the “truth” so to speak. As Gina says at the beginning of the story–“I’m never sure if you remember or are told.”

Now don’t forget to get back to me on what your book club thinks!

The Imperfectionists by Tom Rachman

literarymasters Literary Masters book groups, The Imperfectionists, Tom Rachman, traditional novel, Uncategorized Leave a comment


If you just want a quick “bottom line,” here it is: read this book. It is so good. Let me warn you, however–it is not a novel in the traditional sense, but rather a series of vignettes taking place in or about the same Rome-based English language newspaper (think International Herald Tribune) at different times, with some characters from each chapter popping up as bit players or as the main attraction of other chapters.

This bothered me at first because I thought I was reading a traditional novel, but also, and more to the point, the writing captured me immediately, and I was so drawn into the first story that I wanted more. Once I realized the structure of the book, however, I went with it and just loved it.

So, rather than review each plot or character, let me say that Tom Rachman can write. The characters, the plots, the themes, the descriptions, the metaphors, everything is a pleasure. Loosely, the time period covers from 1953, when wealthy businessman Cyrus Ott decides to found an international newspaper in Rome, and progresses through to 2007, with Ott’s grandson Oliver at the helm.

The structure of alternating chapters charts the ravages of time and progress on the paper itself, followed by a chapter that illuminates the (sometimes ravaged) lives of those who work for it. Rachman is so good at drawing his characters that you feel you know them in the short time you’re with them, and you also get a feel for what it’s like to be a journalist. Yikes!

Along with the superb characters and their stories is the setting of Rome, a place where I have been but I don’t know well. Rachman knows it well and seems to love it; I was reminded of Ian McEwan’s treatment of London in Saturday. The Imperfectionists made me want to go to Rome!

I highly recommend this book. It’s compelling, it’s clever, it’s original, and it’s a darn-tooting good read. Is it a good choice for a book club? Well, I think it could be tricky because of its structure, but if you have a group that really concentrates and will sit and draw connections between all the vignettes, then it could work. If you have a chatty club that doesn’t focus well or have structured discussions, then I’d suggest you choose a more traditional novel.

Tell me what you think about The Imperfectionists. And Tom Rachman, if you’re reading this, please write another book soon!

Should Your Book Club Read Foreign Bodies by Cynthia Ozick?

literarymasters Book Clubs, book groups, Cynthia Ozick, Foreign Bodies, Uncategorized Leave a comment


My personal book club met the other night to discuss Foreign Bodies by Cynthia Ozick and the reception was extremely tepid. I don’t want to beat a dead horse here, so for my first blog post on this book, look here.

I was a tad surprised at the group’s consensus on this book. Everyone felt it was confusing for no apparent reason, and came away from it saying “huh?” There were eight of us gathered, and the other seven, like me, felt that perhaps they had missed something because they hadn’t read The Ambassadors by Henry James. One member, let’s call her Becky, actually made the effort to read about The Ambassadors on Wikipedia, but came away from it with very little insight–into either book!

Another member, let’s call her Susan, said that she thought the book was all about people who didn’t fit in somewhere–or who were foreign–struggling to belong. Marvin (the horrid father) is Jewish and so hasn’t had entry to many places he desired; his son Julian is a foreigner in Paris, as is his wife. Her foreign status is underscored by the fact that she’s a refugee, and being Romanian, a not very welcome refugee to boot. So, yes, that is that concern running through the story.

Someone, let’s call her Mary, mentioned that Bea undergoes the biggest transformation in the novel. I alluded to her change in my earlier blog post, and I can add here that she succeeds in shedding the suffocating control of her former husband and her horrid brother. Someone, let’s call her Barbara, thought that the former husband was worse than Bea’s brother. Which brings me to another point we discussed:

The lack of sympathetic characters in this book.

Let’s call her Lisa said she did like one person–Margaret, whom Marvin had sent off to the looney bin. The rest of us, however, couldn’t find anyone we cared about (well, maybe Lily a little bit), and wondered if that’s what was wrong with the book. Not that I think the characters have to be likable or sympathetic for a book to be good–I don’t think that at all. But there was something about this book that left us all…unsatisfied.

We then discussed the “group-think” of book critics, and wondered whether Cynthia Ozick was just getting by on her reputation. Most of us liked her writing quite a bit; you’ll remember that in my earlier blog post I said it sparkled. But this novel is not as wonderful as the book critics made it out to be, and that makes me wonder about the book critics!

Now, is it a good choice for a book club? I would say yes IF you read The Ambassadors along with it. Otherwise, I’m not sure I would select it. There are other books out there I would choose first.

Do you disagree? Tell me, what do you think of Foreign Bodies?

The Hand That First Held Mine by Maggie O’Farrell

literarymasters book groups, Costa Award, Maggie O'Farrell, Points to Ponder, The Hand That First Held Mine, Uncategorized Leave a comment


Two alternating narratives, one taking place in bohemian London, mainly set in Soho during the fifties and sixties, the other mostly in North London in the present day. Seemingly unconnected at first, the trajectories of the parallel stories will arrive at the same point.

Lexie and Innes are living in Soho, trying to get a fledgling magazine on its feet. They are captivating and compelling characters, as is the time in which they live. We watch them meet, court, work together, grow as individuals, and make what mark they can on London and on history. We get drawn into their lives, but then, just as we’re feeling pretty cozy with them, we switch to the story of…

…Elina and Ted in present day North London. Elina has recently given birth to Jonah, and evidently it was a horrific experience that she almost didn’t survive. I’m not sure what relevance that has to the story (something your book club can discuss!), but we spend quite some time worrying with Ted over Elina’s well-being and stability. We experience the daily reality of new motherhood with her, and see the impact the new baby is having on her and Ted’s relationship. It takes us awhile to realize that it is Ted we should be worrying about, not Elina. What is wrong with him? What are the flashes of memory he’s experiencing? What has he been through that we don’t know–that he doesn’t know?

Eventually the mystery starts to clear, and we can work out what the connection between the two narratives is. I don’t know if I was slow or spot on at this, but even when I was fairly certain I had it all worked out, I still wanted to read on, to find out the whys and the hows and the what nexts. And I think I just wanted more of the characters. I really liked them. In fact…

I quite enjoyed this book. Although let me say up front that the same things I liked about it also annoyed me a tiny bit.

The writing, for instance. Maggie O’Farrell is a terrific writer and some passages were fabulous, really fabulous; I especially liked when she would rewind a scene, taking the reader through it as though we were actually viewing it. I felt like I was watching a screen. She also built a good deal of suspense into the story, and I was sucked into reading late into the night, needing to know more.

But–paradoxically–I found the pace of the novel somewhat slow at times. I only say this because I can imagine some book group members getting frustrated, and, after giving it some thought, I feel any reader of The Hand That First Held Mine has to…just succumb to its timing and rhythms–they are part of the beauty of the book.

Another book group frustration I’m anticipating: the characters aren’t deep enough. Well, I loved these characters, every one. Did I want more of them? Yes. Could I have appreciated more depth? Yes. But these characters are so interesting, I think each one could stand his or her own novel. Again, this is something your book group can discuss.

All in all, this is a worthy novel (it did just win the Costa Award!), and one that I think is good for a book group discussion. If you want “Points to Ponder” for this novel, contact me!

A Personal Matter by Kenzaburo Oe

literarymasters A Personal Matter, Kenzaburo Oe, Literary Masters book groups, Uncategorized Leave a comment


Kenzaburo Oe won the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1994, but I hadn’t read any of his books until this one. My brother–the one who never goes to the library because he doesn’t like used books–is really into Japanese literature. He gave me a stack of novels last week by various authors, and I chose this one because it was short–only 165 pages.

But those pages really do pack a wallop.

This book is not for everyone. And I don’t think I could choose it for my Literary Masters book groups. Although it’s very literary and there is much to think about, explore, and appreciate, the subject matter is quite painful. The protagonist Bird’s son has just been born with a grotesque deformity protruding from his head. We follow Bird as he reacts to and tries to escape from this shocking reality, and much of the book is very bleak, bordering on kind of sick in some parts.

Yet it’s really good. I found myself looking forward to getting back to it, I think because, along with all the depravity, there is also deep psychological understanding and human compassion in the story. Although Oe taps into our deepest fears, he also illuminates the resilience and courage that we are capable of.

For those who can handle the subject matter and who don’t mind reading something that isn’t, well, pleasant, I highly recommend this book. If you read it, let me know what you think. I am looking forward to my next novel by Kenzaburo Oe. I should go look at that stack of books my brother gave me…

Costa Award Winners by Category

literarymasters Costa Book Award, Uncategorized, Whitbread Award Leave a comment


The Costa Awards, the prestigious literary prize formerly known as the Whitbread Awards, has announced the winners of its categories–novel, debut novel, biography, poetry, and children’s book. The Hand That First Held Mine by Maggie O’Farrell has won for the novel category, and I can’t wait to get my hands on it!

The overall winner for the Costa Book of the Year will be chosen from the catefory winners, and will be announced later this month, so stay tuned!

To learn more, go to http://www.costabookawards.com/index.aspx

Coffee and a great book–what’s not to love?

How Not to Act Old by Pamela Redmond Satran

literarymasters book groups, How Not to Act Old, Pamela Redmond Satran, Uncategorized Leave a comment


This book is hilarious! A friend gave it to me recently (hmm…was she hinting at something?) and I have been laughing ever since. Comprised of 185 tips on how not to act old, this little gem was written precisely with me in mind, I am sure. Its aim is for anyone over the advanced and senile age of 40, but I swear, it really was written just for me.

Take, for instance, tip #52: don’t yell into your cell phone. How many times have my children accused me of doing just that? Well, every time I’m on my cell phone, actually. And what about tip #32: don’t be proud of being befuddled by technology. Right, I’m going to stop referring to myself as a luddite immediately. Just using the word “luddite” is probably old.

As I was gobbling down each tip as if it were a rejuvenating vitamin sure to reverse the decay and decline that has already set in, I kept thinking, yes, that’s true, that’s right, that’s exactly how it is. I must be old!

Satran has a razor sharp eye and wit to go with it, and I thoroughly enjoyed her book. She also has a blog–from which the book was launched–you can access it at www.hownottoactold.com. You can access it? I’m sure there’s a younger way to say that.